Maintainability of a complaint of dishonour of cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, in a case where the company is not being arraigned as an Accused
The two-judge bench comprising of Justice Hemant Gupta and Justice D Y Chandrachud of Supreme Court in the recent case of Himanshu v. B. Shivamurthy & another[1]have ruled out that, in order to maintain prosecution under Section 141 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, it is imperative to arraign the company as an accused. The appellant, …